Sunday, November 27, 2016

Why are Kansas and Texas doing so badly, and California so well?

by Robert Reich
Nov. 26, 2016

California is now the capital of liberal America. Along with its neighbors Oregon and Washington, it will be a nation within a nation starting in January, when the federal government goes dark.

In contrast to much of the rest of the nation, Californians preferred Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump by nearly a 2-to-1 margin. That came to about 3 million votes. Californians also returned large Democratic majorities to the state legislature to work with a Democratic governor, and they sent a Democrat, Kamala Harris — part black, part Asian —to the U.S. Senate.

Californians also voted to extend a state tax surcharge on the wealthy and to adopt local housing and transportation measures, along with a slew of local tax increases and bond proposals.

In other words, California is the opposite of Trumpland.

The differences go deeper. For years, conservatives have been saying that a healthy economy depends on low taxes, few regulations and low wages.

At the one end of the scale are Kansas and Texas, with among the nation’s lowest taxes, fewest regulations and lowest wages.

At the other end is California, with among the nation’s highest taxes, especially on the wealthy; toughest regulations, particularly when it comes to the environment; most ambitious health care system, which insures more than 12 million poor Californians, in partnership with Medicaid; and high wages.

So, according to conservative doctrine, Kansas and Texas ought to be booming, and California ought to be in the pits.

Actually, it’s just the opposite.

For several years now, the rate of economic growth in Kansas has been the worst in the nation. Last year its economy actually shrank.

Texas hasn’t been doing all that much better. Its rate of job growth has been below the national average. The value of Texas exports has been dropping.

But what about so-called over-taxed, over-regulated, high-wage California?

California leads the nation in the rate of economic growth — more than twice the national average. If it were a separate nation, it would now be the sixth-largest economy in the world. Its population has surged to 39 million (up 5 percent since 2010).

California is home to the nation’s fastest-growing and most innovative industries — entertainment and high-tech. It incubates more startups than anywhere else in the world.

In other words, conservatives have it exactly backward.

Why are Kansas and Texas doing so badly, and California so well?

For one thing, taxes enable states to invest their people.


California’s regulations protect the public health and the state’s natural beauty, which also draws people to the state — including talented people who could settle anywhere.

Wages are high in California because the economy is growing so fast that employers have to pay more to attract workers. That’s not a bad thing. After all, the goal isn’t just growth. It’s a high standard of living.


California is far from perfect. A housing shortage has driven rents and home prices into the stratosphere. Roads are clogged. Its public schools used to be the best in the nation but are now among the worst — largely because of a proposition approved by voters in 1978 that’s strangled local school financing. Much more needs to be done.

But overall, the contrast is clear. Economic success depends on tax revenues that go into public investments, and on regulations that protect the environment and public health. And true economic success results in high wages.

Read more here:


No comments:

Post a Comment