Monday, January 13, 2020

Tom Steyer misguided on term limits


I am for Steyer's stance on global warming, but I disagree with his proposal for term limits.

https://news.yahoo.com/let-tom-steyer-worst-idea-122745087.html

Jonathan Bernstein
,Bloomberg•January 13, 2020

•••••

As the scholar of Congress Josh Huder notes, “65% of the Senate and 70% of the House have served 10 years or less.” Today’s Congress is historically weak, and one reason is the relatively short tenure of many members. As it is, short-timers allow themselves to be bossed around by experienced leaders or by the White House. That’s bad enough, but if experienced leaders were eliminated, Congress would find itself bossed by the White House and by large organized interest groups. That’s not just the logic of the situation; it’s also what political scientists who have studied term limits in state legislatures have found.

•••••

It gets worse. Steyer is also for instituting regular national policy referendums. As anyone who has been following U.K. politics or California politics surely knows, asking people to vote directly on policy just seems like a way to empower them. In fact, it’s just like Congressional term limits: It’s a way to transfer influence away from regular voters and toward organized interests.

•••••

No comments:

Post a Comment